Discuss the
roles and representation of three female characters within the horror genre.
Within
horror films particularly, women are traditionally represented as the victims
and men represented as the monster and hero. Traditionally women are
represented in horror films as the damsel in distress and are usually being
attacked by the killer because they have committed a sinful act. This sinful
act is usually sex/drugs, and so they get punished by being killed. This is
particularly clear to see in the ‘slasher’ subgenre of horror, such films as
‘Scream’, ‘Halloween’ and ‘Friday the 13th’.
There are
many theories surrounding the representation of women within the horror genre.
Laura Mulvey’s ‘male gaze theory’ suggests that the camera is male, and so the
audience see things as a typical heterosexual male would see them. This means
that women are seen as ‘sex objects’ rather than people, which could link back
to them being killed in horror films after having sex or doing drugs. The way
in which they are killed could also be because of the ‘male gaze theory’. Men
are usually killed quickly and sometimes off-camera. This is because the
audience don’t want to see random males being killed. However, when a woman is
killed, it is often long and almost torturous. Adding to this, the women are
usually in their underwear. An example of this is Tina’s death in ‘Friday the
13th’ (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eDSsxnIDNDU). She is dressed in just a shirt,
which is provocative in the way that her legs are exposed to the audience.
Adding to this, the camera from 1:29 to 1:41 is a handheld one, as if someone
is chasing her. It focuses again mainly on her legs and the idea of her being
helpless. When it cuts to the bedroom and Tina is cut, the producers of the
film took advantage of this and poured blood all over her body, which again
provokes the audience. She writhes around in pain (with much of the camera
focusing on her legs) getting thrown around the room before eventually dying. This
also supports Laura Mulvey’s idea of the camera being from a heterosexual
male’s perspective.
Another
theory on the representation of women within the horror genre is Carol Clover’s
‘final girl theory’. The final girl
is a feature in horror films (particular slasher, as with Laura Mulvey’s ‘male
gaze theory’) that focuses around the ‘final girl’ alive to stop the killer,
and tell the story of what happened. Pre 90s feminist theorists saw the final
girls as ‘damsels in distress’, women who need rescuing, victims of masculine
rage- essentially underpowered women. Arguably, the final girl is in dozens of
films, including ‘Halloween’, ‘Friday the 13th’, ‘A Nightmare on Elm Street’ and ‘Scream’. Carol Clover first mentioned the ‘final girl theory’ in her 1992 book ‘Men, Women, and Chainsaws: Gender in the Modern Horror
Film’. She suggests
that in these films, the viewer begins by sharing the perspective of the
killer, but has a shift in relation to the final girl throughout the film.
Clover argues that they are not victims of patriarchy and so fight back. An
example of a ‘final girl’ is Laurie in ‘Halloween’ (played by Jamie Lee Curtis), who is the girl to
fight back. She does this by stabbing her attacker with a knitting needle.
Clover would argue that a knitting needle was chosen to stab the killer because
it is stereotypically a woman’s object, which supports the idea that the ‘final
girl’ is fighting against masculine rage. When the killer comes after her
again, she stabs him again, this time with a coat hanger. This ending combines
ideas of her being saved and her fighting back.
The
idea of Horror and Homogeneity is where those who dare to go against
conservatism in horror films are the first to be murdered. The ‘slutty’ female;
those who get drunk do drugs and have sex are usually always killed. However,
the final girl escapes because she doesn’t partake in these symbols of adult
life. Clover also questioned who the audience identifies with. Rather than the
previous view which was an assumption that the largely mal author identified
with the male killer. However Clover argued that the audience identifies with
the final girl instead.
However some
films go against this structure. This could be where the producers decide
deliberately to change the structure in order to lull the audience into a false
sense of stability within character types, specifically the ‘final girl’ in
‘Scream’. The opening scene in ‘Scream’ stars Drew Barrymore having a ‘scary
movie’ night in on her own (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G3lSvJ5RXKA). As she is an educated, upper class
girl in a big house, the audience assumes that she may be the ‘final girl’.
When she dies after ten minutes, the audience are not only shocked that the
possible ‘final girl’ has died, but also because at the time, Drew Barrymore
was such a huge star that it was totally unexpected for her to die almost
instantly. This scene totally flipped the conventions of not only the ‘final
girl theory’, but also that big stars can’t die, on its head.
Claude
Levi-Strauss’ theory could also be applied to the representation of women in
horror movies. He looked at narrative structure in terms of binary oppositions.
Claude Levi-Strauss was more interested for deeper arrangements of themes. In a
horror film there are obvious binary oppositions. Using ‘Scream’ as an example
again, there is the obvious one of good vs. evil, or killer vs. victim. However
there are also less obvious ones which can be seen, such as the inner turmoil
of the lead character Sydney which is grief vs. carrying on as normal. Another
major binary opposition is truth vs. lies, which runs throughout the whole
film, in the form of the suspects and the actual killers. Finally, a binary
opposition which is present in almost all horror films is known vs. unknown, in
the case of Scream, the unknown is who the killer is and who they will attack
next, and the known is that there is a serial killer who is killing helpless
people.
Propp’s
theory is another theory which can be applied to the representation of women in
horror films. Propp’s
theory of character types suggests that there are 8 character roles within
films. He looked at 100s of old folk tales to establish this. He argues that in
a film there is always: The villain(s)(usually female), the hero (usually
male), the donor (person who provides an object with magic property), the
helper (who aids the hero), the princess (reward of the hero), her father (who
rewards the hero), the dispatcher (who sends the hero on their task), and
finally the false hero. The fact that Propp assumed that most villains were
female shows the view that people had on women in the time of Old Russian
folk-tales was not a good one. As horror films have progressed, the villain has
tended to change to male, with the victims usually being female, due to the stereotypical
‘helplessness’ of women and ‘toughness’ of men.
Todorov’s theory of narrative structure suggests that the
story begins with equilibrium where everything is in balance. This is then
disrupted by an event, causing disequilibrium. Problems are then resolved into
a new equilibrium by the end of a story. In horror films, this structure is
usually followed in terms of the final girl, as they start of living a normal
life. They then go through turmoil throughout the film until they usually kill
the killer, which then starts there normal life again (restoring equilibrium
again).
In conclusion, it is clear to see that all of these theories
are partly present within horror movies. In my opinion, the ‘final girl theory’
by Carol Clover makes more logical sense and can be seen more than Laura
Mulvey’s ‘male gaze theory’, and so is a stronger theory all in all.
No comments:
Post a Comment