Full analysis of Insidious
Insidious is an American psychological/supernatural
horror
film, written by Leigh
Whannell
and directed by James Wan. The film
featured Patrick
Wilson,
Rose Byrne, Lin Shaye, and Barbara Hershey. It was
released in theatres in America on April 1, 2011.
Todorov’s
theory of narrative structure suggests that the story begins with equilibrium
where everything is in balance. This is then disrupted by an event, causing
disequilibrium. Problems are then resolved into a new equilibrium by the end of
a story. Insidious follows this narrative structure closely, until the end of
the film. It begins with equilibrium, with the Lambert family moving into a new
house, and having a new start. The event which disrupts the equilibrium is
arguably when the little boy (Dalton) breaks the ladder and falls off, which
brings darkness and shows that all is not well. However, Dalton going into a
coma is more easily recognisable as the disruption of equilibrium. It could be
argued that there is a restoration of equilibrium at the end of the film, with
Dalton being rescued. However, due to the fact that his dad (Josh) becomes
trapped by his childhood demon again, leaves the film on a cliff-hanger and
makes the audience believing that there isn’t a restoration of equilibrium.
An audience
would expect to be terrified while watching this film, due to the fact that
they know that the film is a horror. Many audience members will have looked up
information on it and so will be expecting different things. Insidious has what
can be assumed as a male villain (the demon), trying to capture the body of a
small boy (Dalton), in order to live again on Earth and do evil things. This
goes against the traditional genre template which Hollywood set, a male killer
killing a female victim. Because this film challenges the typical horror film,
there is no ‘final girl’, because the main women in the film are not in any
danger throughout the film. Laura Mulvey suggested that the male gaze in Hollywood
films reflects the male unconscious mind: most filmmakers are male,
and so the gaze of the camera is male. However, it could be argued that the
camera is not in the perspective of a male’s gaze, as women are not depicted as
sex objects in this film, instead are seen as helpers. In contrast to this,
they are still seen as vulnerable and helpless, which supports Mulvey’s theory.
At the time
where this film was made (00’s), the popular subgenre within horror was
Psychological horror and ‘Torture-Porn’. It could be argued that this film is a
psychological horror, as it plays with the audience’s mind. However, it doesn’t
have elements of ‘toture0porn’, as there are no gruesome deaths or blood being
shed. Instead, the film returns to the 60’s, with the ideas of ghosts, Satanism
and family, which again defies the modern conventions of a horror film.
Propp’s
theory of character types suggests that there are 8 character roles within films.
He looked at 100s of old folk tales to establish this. He argues that in a film
there is always: The villain(s)(usually female), the hero (usually male), the
donor (person who provides an object with magic property), the helper (who aids
the hero), the princess (reward of the hero), her father (who rewards the
hero), the dispatcher (who sends the hero on their task), and finally the false
hero. Insidious has many of these character types, and so complies with Propp’s
theory. It has a hero, in the form of the father (Josh Lambert). It is easy to
distinguish him as the hero, as he tries desperately to save the victim
throughout the film (his son, Dalton). There is a clear villain (the demon). It
could be argued that there is a donor(Elise Rainier), who gives the hero a
magical item, in the form of a metronome, in order for the hero to go into the
parallel word to save his son. There are three clear helpers, the
‘demon-hunters’(Elise Rainier, Specs and Tucker). Elise Rainier could also be
the dispatcher, as she tells the hero how to save his son. However, there is no
apparent princess or father, as the thing that the hero is trying to save is
his son, and he gets no reward, other than getting his son back of course.
In conclusion, Insidious roughly follows the narrative
structure of Todorov, with the exception of there not being a restoration of
equilibrium. However, it strongly complies with Propp’s theory, and has most
of, if not all of the eight character types which he established. The audience
would probably be satisfied with this film, as it would be everything that they
would expect from a psychological supernatural horror.
No comments:
Post a Comment